The Morris
Communications Corp. antitrust lawsuit filed this week against the
PGA Tour could have significant implications for the way the media
covers sporting events and increase the already stiff competition in
developing Internet sites, industry observers said.
U.S. antitrust laws are designed to promote free competition by
outlawing such things as monopolies. The Morris suit says the Tour
has a monopoly over real-time, hole-by-hole golf scores from its
tournaments because it posts the scores on its own free Internet
site but is preventing Morris from selling those scores to other
media.
"The antitrust implications could be significant" if Morris
prevails, said Harvey S. Jacobs, managing director of Jacobs &
Associates law firm in Washington and a frequent commentator to the
media on Internet law. "It'll have a huge trickle-down impact. . . .
Every sporting event at that point is going to be a free-for-all."
But Jacobs said he doesn't expect Morris to prevail because it
would strike at the heart of sports organizations' control over
their property.
The case reflects a trend of increasing conflict between
organizations that control events and those that control digital
depictions of the events, said Anandra Mitra, who teaches Internet
ethics at Wake Forest University in North Carolina.
"This is an . . . issue with the Internet that's going to come up
over and over, and . . . [Morris is] at the forefront of that
issue," Mitra said.
The conflict takes on added significance as news organizations
seek new ways to do business in the 21st century, Mitra said.
"People are expecting with the new technologies that things will
be there immediately," he said. "It's the trend. . . . Time is
disappearing."
'Instant gratification'
There's no question that sports on the Internet is a growing
business and "real-time scoring" -- the ability to present scores
almost as they happen -- is a key component.
"Consumers have come to expect virtually instant gratification
when it comes to seeking any sort of information, whether it be
sports or the news of the day," said David Carlson, director of the
interactive media lab at the University of Florida's College of
Journalism and Communications in Gainesville. "All of us have gotten
used to getting information instantly."
By most accounts, the first legal battle over real-time scores
was in 1997 when Motorola wanted to send up-to-the-minute scores and
statistics from National Basketball Association games to subscribers
with Motorola pagers.
When the NBA sued to block that effort, the courts were forced
into uncharted territory.
Judges were asked to referee between the desires of sports
leagues and franchises to control information from their events and
the competitive needs of media to quickly disseminate information.
The NBA lost that battle when an appeals court ruled that athletic
events themselves are not copyrightable, even if broadcasts are.
This week, the Morris suit shifted that battleground to the
usually sedate links of the PGA Tour. Morris, located in Augusta, is
the Times-Union's parent company.
According to documents filed with Wednesday's lawsuit, the CNN/SI
Internet site maintained by Cable News Network and Sports
Illustrated paid The Augusta Chronicle, a Morris newspaper, $460,000
to provide real-time scores from Tour events this year, and an
unspecified amount for the next two years. Morris says in the filing
that it has a multimillion-dollar investment in the Internet and has
spent about $200,000 developing software to syndicate real-time golf
scores.
"If the PGA Tour restrictions on dissemination of this data were
removed, we would be able to grow a multimillion-dollar business
doing so," Michael Romaner, director of online services for Morris,
wrote in a deposition.
Likewise, the Tour, headquartered in Ponte Vedra Beach, puts live
scores on its own Internet site on which it sells advertising. The
Tour also provides real-time scoring for USA Today, but Tour
officials wouldn't say how much that contract is worth.
"The numbers you see on the Web site are just the tip of the
iceberg," said Tour spokesman Bob Combs. "Underneath it is a very
substantial investment in the hardware and software that actually
drives the scoring system as well as the significant number of staff
and volunteers to gather and input the data."
For that reason, Mitra said, it's no surprise the Tour is
challenging Morris's right to sell the information because it wants
to keep those rights for itself.
Turf war
Media organizations like Morris are used to fighting these kind
of battles on First Amendment grounds, challenging the government
for access to public records and meetings.
But sports leagues, like the Tour, aren't the government, forcing
Morris to go the antitrust route. The antitrust argument is that the
Tour is monopolizing information in the public domain for the
benefit of its own Internet site by denying or threatening to deny
credentials to Morris Internet staff unless the company agrees not
to sell the information to other media.
The Tour and Morris have been negotiating over real-time scores
since January 1999, when the Tour placed a restriction on Internet
reports of its events, saying scores could not be posted for 30
minutes, according to a declaration filed with Wednesday's lawsuit
by Times-Union Publisher Carl Cannon.
"The stated purpose of that language was to allow the PGA Tour to
sell the rights to real-time scoring and to prevent other news
organizations from posting scores in a timely manner," Cannon wrote.
When Morris objected, the Tour revised those restrictions, saying
the scores could be posted as soon as they were in the public
domain, court documents show.
Then in January, the Tour again revised the restrictions, saying
credentialed media couldn't sell real-time scores. Morris again
challenged the policy and a temporary negotiation was worked out
where Morris Internet employees could use the Tour's Internet site
to collect and post the scores. Cannon said in his declaration this
method proved "untimely, inaccurate and incomplete."
Last month, Cannon wrote the Tour, saying Morris would seek
credentials to Tour events to provide real-time scores to other
Internet sites. On Oct. 4, the Tour yanked Morris Internet
credentials for next week's Tampa Bay Classic.
"It is not a pleasant task for me to be at odds with the PGA
Tour," Cannon wrote. "I serve on the board of the PGA Tour
Charities. . . . The local tournament, now known as the TPC, was
begun by Florida Publishing Co."
The Tour also was reluctant to go to court. In a letter last
month to Cannon, Tour Commissioner Tim Finchem cited the "special
relationship" between the Times-Union and the Tour and the "many
millions of dollars" they and other organizations have raised for
charity.
"It would be a shame to detract from all these positives by
having the PGA Tour and The Florida Times-Union as adversaries in a
public legal proceeding," Finchem said, noting he expects other
courts around the country to face similar issues.
Despite the high monetary stakes and the antitrust arguments,
"this matter is about who will report the news," said George Gabel,
a First Amendment attorney in Jacksonville who represents Morris.
"Will it be the press, which has that responsibility under the
U.S. Constitution, or will the entity being reported about be
allowed, by virtue of an ability to both control information and
become a publisher itself, self-report the news as it sees fit? The
PGA Tour, as the source of news, should not be free to condition the
dissemination of facts upon the satisfaction of its economic
demands," Gabel said in a motion requesting a preliminary injunction
against the Tour.
However, Jacobs said the fundamental questions are whether the
scores are mere facts or the property of the Tour, and when those
scores are in the public domain, giving anyone the right to publish
them. Since Tour events occur mostly on private property, Morris
faces an uphill battle, he predicted.